Developing high demand cognitive mathematics tasks with robotic simulators
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61303/2735668X.v1i1.20Keywords:
Mathematics education, Mathematical tasks, learning simulators, educational roboticsAbstract
It is considered that technologies enhance mathematical learning, but the constant updat- ing of technologies makes it difficult for teachers to update their knowledge. The group of Estudios Curriculares en Educación Mathematics (GECEM) linked to the Postgraduate Program in Teaching Science and Mathematics (PPGECIM), of the Lutheran University of Brazil (ULBRA), in Canoas, in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, develops learning simulators to support teachers in their classroom practice with mathematical tasks with high cognitive demands. Robotic arm simulators are presented as learning objects with advantages over the real ones because they are less expensive, do not require mechanical adjustments, do not break, do not need to be transported, being great for classroom or online activities.
Downloads
References
Cyrino, M. C. de C. T., y Jesus, C. C. de (2014). Análise de tarefas matemá- ticas em uma proposta de formação continuada de professoras que ensinam matemática. Ciência & Educação (Bauru), 20(3), 751-764. https://doi. org/10.1590/1516-73132014000300015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-73132014000300015
D’Angelo, C., Rutstein, D., Harris, C., Bernard, R., Borokhovski, E., y Haertel, G. (2014). Simulations for STEM Learning : Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Melo Park, CA: SRI Education.
Demo, P. (2011). Olhar do educador e novas tecnologias. Senac: A R. Educ. Prof, 37(2), 15-26. Retrieved from http://pedrodemo.sites.uol.com.br
Flores, C. R., Wagner, D. R., y Buratto, I. C. F. (2012). Pesquisa em visualização na edu- cação matemática : conceitos, tendências e perspectivas. Educação Matemática Pesquisa, 14(1), 31-45.
Gutiérrez, Á. (1996). Visualization in 3-Dimensional Geometry: In Search of a Framework. In Proceedings of the 20th PME Conference (Vol. 1, 3-19). https:// doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Homa, A. I. R. (2019a). Objetos De Aprendizaje Tridimensionales Construidos Con El Software Geogebra. Revista Paradigma, 40(1), 69-79.
Homa, A. I. R. (2019b). Robotics Simulators in STEM Education. Acta Scientiae, 21(5), 178-191. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.5417 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.5417
Lohman, D. F. (1996). Spatial Ability and g. In Human Abilities: Their Nature and Measurement (pp. 97-116). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mishra, P., y Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi. org/10.1177/016146810610800610 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Moore, T. J., y Smith, K. A. (2014). Advancing the State of the Art of STEM Integration. Journal of STEM E Duc a Tion, 15(1), 5-11.
Niess, M. L., y Gillow-Wiles, H. (2017). Expanding teachers’ technological pedagogi- cal reasoning with a systems pedagogical approach. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3), 77-95. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3473 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3473
Psotka, J. (2013). Educational Games and Virtual Reality as Disruptive Technologies. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 69-80.
Ronau, R. N., Rakes, C. R., y Niess, M. L. (2011). Educational technology, teacher knowledge, and classroom impact: A research handbook on frameworks and approaches. Educational Technology, Teacher Knowledge, and Classroom Impact: A Research Handbook on Frameworks and Approaches. https://doi. org/10.4018/978-1-60960-750-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-750-0
Smith, M. S., y Stein, M. K. (1998). Selecting and creating mathematical tasks: From research to practice. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 3(5), 344-350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.3.5.0344
Stein, M. K., y Smith, M. S. (1998). Mathematical Tasks as a Framework for Reflection: From Research to Practice. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 3(4), 268-275. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41180401 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.3.4.0268
Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., Henningsen, M. A., y Silver, E. A. (2000). Implementing standarts based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional develop- ment (D. F. Treagust, R. Duit, & B. J. Fraser, Eds.), Riskesdas 2018.
Stohlmann, M., Moore, T. J., y Roehrig, G. H. (2012). Considerations for Teaching Integrated STEM Education. Journal of Pre-College Engeneering Education Research, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314653 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314653
Wu, Y., y Anderson, O. R. (2015). Technology-enhanced STEM (science, teechnology, engineering, and mathematics) education. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(3), 245-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-015-0041-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-015-0041-2
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Agostinho Iaqchan Ryokiti Homa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
